Four networks, one view
A global reserve view is only as complete as the networks it can read. Boli's v1 priority covers the four networks where the same economic value is most often represented more than once — and treats the bridges between them as inputs rather than exceptions.
Supply is read where it lives.
Each supported network has its own observers reporting circulating supply for the registered representations on that network. The protocol does not depend on a single canonical chain — the global view is assembled from all of them.
Ethereum mainnet and the major L2s, where most multi-chain representations of an asset first appear.
SVM-native representations, read directly rather than inferred from bridge accounting.
Stellar asset representations, common for payment- and remittance-oriented issuance.
DAML-based representations on Canton, where sub-transaction privacy changes what a public observer can see.
Bridges are inputs, not afterthoughts.
Bridges, wrappers, and burn-and-mint mechanisms are exactly what create local views of supply in the first place. Treating them as first-class inputs is what allows the same economic value to be counted once globally, rather than once per network.
Cross-chain messaging and token transfer routes declared as inputs to the global view.
Wrapped and native-token-transfer routes between supported networks.
Omnichain messaging routes, including burn-and-mint style representations.
Additional bridges are added as they become available rather than fixed at launch.
Which networks count is a governance decision.
The set of supported networks and bridges is not fixed by the protocol authors. Coverage expands as new networks and bridges become relevant, without a new protocol.
Coverage is what makes the invariant meaningful.
An invariant that only holds on the networks you happen to be watching is not an invariant. Coverage expands by governance, not by a new protocol.